Serotonin and Risky Behavior
Serotonin and Risky Male Behavior in Monkeys (Higley et al., 1996)
- Aim: Is serotonin related to taking risks?
- Method: A field study where they followed male monkeys who were migrating to new social groups
- Measured the serotonin by extracting cerebrospinal flluid by placing needles in their spines
- The independent variable was dividing the monkeys into high, mid-high, mid-low and low serotonin groups
- The dependent variables were how aggressive the monkeys were observed to be, number of scars they had and death
- Results: 11/49 of the monkeys who died had low serotonin levels
- Conclusion: Monkeys with low levels of serotonin are more likely to take risks like fighting with other monkeys
- Evaluation: This field study has high ecological validity but lacks the control of lab experiments
- Sex difference - What about female monkeys?
- External validity - Do these results generalize to human males?
- Aim: Is serotonin related to taking risks for females?
- Method: Observational study of captive monkeys
- The independent variable was the species of monkey: rhesus monkeys or pigtailed macaques
- Rhesus monkeys are known to be aggressive
- Pigtailed macaques are known to be friendly
- The dependent variable was the level of serotonin they measured in the cerebrospinal fluid like Higley et al., 1996
- Another dependent variable was how aggressive the monkeys behaved and how many wounds they had
- They placed each monkey in same sex groups to see how they behaved
- Results: Rhesus monkeys were more aggressive and had more wounds
- Rhesus monkeys had less serotoninthan pigtailed macaques
- Conclusion: Serotonin inhibits risky behavior in females as well
- Evaluation: This field study has high ecological validity but lacks the control of lab experiments
- External validity - Do these results generalize to human females?
- Aim: Test if serotonin levels are related to gambling risks in a controlled environment
- Method: They manipulated the amount of serotonin the monkeys could produce by forcing a certain type of diet
- Tryptophan is the raw material required to produce serotonin and is found in certain foods
- The independent variable was the tryptophan level of the diet which was high or low in tryptophan
- High tryptophan meant more serotonin should be produced than the low tryptophan diet
- The dependent variable was the choice the monkey made in the gambling task
- In the gambling task the monkey could choose a safe option which would guarantee they would get a normal amount of juice
- There was a riskier option where they could get a low or high amount of juice
- Results: The low tryptophan group chose the risky option whereas the high tryptophan group chose the safe option
- Conclusion: Levels of tryptophan as determined by diet can affect serotonin levels and risky behavior
- Evaluation: Lab experiment had a high amount of control but a small sample size (only 3 monkeys) and low ecological validity
- Do these results generalize to humans?
No comments:
Post a Comment